Author: Lance Perkins
Date: 14:29:53 08/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
Which "this" are you referring to. The comparison of the two methods? The phased method? or the simplistic method? And why? Its not like I'm all over the phased method idea. I'm just curios. I'm satisfied with what I have (something that works and is easy to maintain). On August 26, 2004 at 16:55:05, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >On August 26, 2004 at 16:25:07, Lance Perkins wrote: > >>After seeing the posted NextMove code, I wonder how much better this is than >>simply generating all the moves and then sorting them in one go. >> >>This code is a little to complex and tool long for my liking, but if it offers a >>very significant gain, maybe I should give it a second look. >> >>I can immagine that when one gets a cutoff, the rest of the moves don't have to >>be generated (captures vs non-captures). However, in leaf nodes, one is very >>likely to generated all the moves anyway. >> >>Has anyone compared these? > >I would avoid this.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.