Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:02:13 08/26/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 26, 2004 at 11:02:31, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On August 26, 2004 at 10:25:15, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >> >> >>By the way... >> >>Remember the last time you claimed that I had written a JICCA article on the >>Crafty parallel algorithm? You ought to be able to find that since it isn't >>buried in the missing CCC archives, right? Did you ever post the citation? >> >>Remember the last time you claimed that I had written that my speedup formula of >>"speedup = 1 + .7 * ( NCPUS - 1 )" worked for all numbers of processors, where I >>claimed it had only been tested through eight or sixteen processors? You did >>provide a quote of that CCC post, correct? Because I seem to recall someone >>else (Rolf) that provided a quote that _exactly_ matched what _I_ said I posted. >> >>Remember the last time you claimed that my speedup formula was wrong, that I had >>made up the data? And I posted the log files from _several_ different runs, >>made back-to-back, and Martin computed the speedups and got numbers _better_ >>than what my formula estimated? >> >>Remember the last time you claimed that on the Cray Blitz DTS positions my >>speedup on your dual was only 1.0? I ran them. GCP ran them. Several ran them >>and all got numbers reasonably close to my prediction formula. >> >>Remember the last time you wrote that my DTS numbers were faked? And that you >>had supposedly ordered a copy of my dissertation and were going to analyze those >>numbers as well? Wasn't that over six months ago? I don't recall your _ever_ >>having posted any comments about those numbers? Could it be that they didn't >>fit with your personal attack agenda? >> >>And you claim _I_ am dishonest? you are about the biggest fraud, and the most >>dishonest person I can think of that posts in CCC. >> >>Congratulations... >> >>I am sure you are proud of that fact... >> >>Your credibility = 1 / X where X has _already_ reached infinity. > > >Almost like Bruce formerly I'm trying it one more time. > >Dear Bob, please reconsider! > >In a dispute between two sides, where the one has academic background and the >other apparently lives from tickling your automatic reflexes (PAWLOV) without >anything to lose - even not his face, there is no chance to make him shy and >ashamed. You know well that you were correct even if you didn't write a single >line in defense. But if you now think that with hundreds of lines you could >persuade the other side to reconsider, to rethink, to be ashamed and then to >apologize, you can wait until the last day on this Earth. I must repeat myself, >for reasons I can only find in your criticism against the whole ICGA and also >Jaap vd H you will get this nonsense for the next years in return. I'm even not >saying that Vincent has an official mandate. No, he's so unimportant that he >thinks he has now found a final and important role in the field. Yes, his >arguments are empty and nasty also abusive and against this charta, and >therefore he should be banned. But I would prepare such an automatic paper with >a couple of principal rejections and everytime he shows up you send the message. >But dont make the mistake to believe that this man will become a decent thinker. >He cant. Because the topics are so difficult and they require certainly a study >in stats at least. But he hasn't and will never have at his age. Again, this is >NOT a thing about convincing someone with the better arguments!! A peroquet >would also always shout "Bob is nasty." But will you always contradict him? No, >you smile at him, knowing that your woman has brainwashed the bird. :)) > > >Because you play too much computerchess. And she's right after all. :) Everytime Vincent shouts "fraud" or "liar" I'm simply going to give him an overwhelming dose of his own medicine. :) He made a dozen posts here about that "JICCA paper". Thread headings saying "So you deny your own paper?" and the like. Utter crap. He never admitted it of course, he just cut and ran as always. Just as he did when he demanded the quad opteron data to see the speedups there. And didn't like what he saw. One day he'll get tired of always being an ass, maybe... Until he does, I'm always ready to ask him about past lies every time he pops up with yet another lie.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.