Author: morphy
Date: 11:49:33 08/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2004 at 12:54:48, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: >I prosume, you are not counting those situations, where one side has or both >sides have not a single pawn. Please check this, because that are also true >pawn situations. I'm going back home now and... thank you Reinhard!, in fact I've forgotten to put in the initial values in the summation nPW=0 and nPB=0, instead of incorrect nPB=1 and nPB=1. So now your underestimate of my result is null: yours: 49095495585283107 mine: 49095495585283107 Your previous understimation was not slightly different if you thought only (8+8) combinations in my results :-) . >Those values specified as exact values will be calculated as exact values. What do you intend for exact values? Bye Giulio
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.