Author: Reinhard Scharnagl
Date: 13:46:56 08/27/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 27, 2004 at 14:49:33, morphy wrote: >On August 27, 2004 at 12:54:48, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: > >>I prosume, you are not counting those situations, where one side has or both >>sides have not a single pawn. Please check this, because that are also true >>pawn situations. > >I'm going back home now and... thank you Reinhard!, in fact I've forgotten to >put in the initial values in the summation nPW=0 and nPB=0, instead of >incorrect nPB=1 and nPB=1. >So now your underestimate of my result is null: >yours: 49095495585283107 >mine: 49095495585283107 >Your previous understimation was not slightly different if you thought only >(8+8) combinations in my results :-) . It seems now that our results are congruent. >>Those values specified as exact values will be calculated as exact values. > >What do you intend for exact values? e.g the knight and rook values on an 8x8 board: [http://www.chessbox.de/Compu/schachveri1.html] >Bye >Giulio Regards, Reinhard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.