Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 00:52:40 08/28/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 28, 2004 at 03:23:56, Reinhard Scharnagl wrote: >On August 27, 2004 at 22:53:04, Stuart Cracraft wrote: > >Hello Stúart, > >personally I try to avoid inspecting foreign chess program sources, because >that only would corrupt one's ideas and phantasy. I claim that analysing chess >program code from other people mostly would be counter productive and would >give one no real benefit at all. > >There are exceptions, where special problems of a language like C++ would be >discussed, but that mostly is independent from any chess know how. Of course >there had been benefits and learning effects from such discussion threads. > >Creating a chess program by "patchworking" it from different sources hardly >could be recognized as a success. Thus doing so can easyly lead to situations >where such "recycled" code would appear as an "own" chess engine, frustrating >and unfairly pushing back the elaborates of serious people. > >I cannot see, how the publishing of chess program sources especially as a full >packet could produce any benefit. Instead it could be more helpful to publish >articles or books on that theme but not including any compilable sources. Sometimes looking at someone's implementation of an algorithm is much better than reading about one. Especially when the algorithm in use is better than the book version and it also contains all the work arounds for the "gotchas" I agree that a patchwork program is not going to do well. People do not help other programmers much. Look at all the open source chess programs on SourceForge. Every single one of them has been rusting for quite a while.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.