Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Do we really want it?

Author: Gerd Isenberg

Date: 04:54:42 08/29/04

Go up one level in this thread


On August 29, 2004 at 04:43:00, Andrew Williams wrote:

>On August 29, 2004 at 03:16:21, Gerd Isenberg wrote:
>
>>On August 28, 2004 at 20:05:49, Dan Honeycutt wrote:
>>
>>>On August 28, 2004 at 14:05:08, Gerd Isenberg wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>I also commend chess program authors, commercial or not, to put some disassembly
>>>>paragraph inside the readme and to remove symbols from the executable.
>>>>
>>>>Gerd
>>>
>>>Hi Gerd:
>>>What do you mean by "put some disassembly paragraph inside the readme"?
>>>
>>>Dan H.
>>
>>I am not a lawyer (IANAL), something like:
>>
>>"It is not permitted to disassemble or reverse engenier this program"
>
>Why would you suggest that? I don't understand?
>
>Andrew

Because disassembling is likely to be an act to spy out a program, which is not
open source. Of course if a severe suspicion is claimed by someone, that a
program is a clone, an independent legal instance is allowed to disassemble to
check the facts, if the autor is not cooperative to show/explain his sources.

I can't imagine that some commercial authors are happy if somebody else
disassembles their program for academic reasons.

Gerd



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 07 Jul 11 08:48:38 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.