Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:43:24 08/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 29, 2004 at 08:27:19, Bryan Hofmann wrote: >On August 29, 2004 at 08:07:37, Uri Blass wrote: > > >>it is not fair that only computers has the right to consult by doing parallel >>search when human opponents have not right to consult by the same way when one >>human analyze line A and another human analyze line B. > >You are comparing Apples to Oranges here. A chess engine would eval a postion >the same way just faster with 2 CPUs. This would not be the case with 2 humans. It is not going to eval faster but to search faster. The same effect can be also achieved by humans. The 2 humans may have different evaluation function and it may be a relative disadvantage but humans have other advantages in consulting and they can decide to consult in that way only in part of the positions and in another part to discuss which plan to choose or they can discuss the reason for their evaluation and one human may convince the second human to change his evaluation. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.