Author: Dan Honeycutt
Date: 07:54:33 08/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 29, 2004 at 08:07:37, Uri Blass wrote: >In the case of computers 2 processors can achieve near 50 elo improvement >relative to one processor. > >I think that it may be interesting to know how much can be achieved by humans. > >If 2 humans with equal rating have the right to consult during the game then >what is going to be the rating of the team in the best case? > >Assume for the discussion time control of 90 minutes per game+30 seconds per >move. > >Unfrtunately 2 humans are not allowed to register to tournaments as a team so we >do not know answer to that question. > >I think that it will be good if chess federations allow team of humans to get a >rating. > >There is a rule that writing notes is not allowed during games even without >consulting. >Disturbing the opponents by noise is also not allowed so the team has to consult >by agreed languages of signs. > >I think also that it may be more interesting to have team of humans against team >of processors. > >it is not fair that only computers has the right to consult by doing parallel >search when human opponents have not right to consult by the same way when one >human analyze line A and another human analyze line B. > >Uri With two processors you don't have the risk that one will decide that the other is an idiot, get angry and refuse to play. Dan H.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.