Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:08:11 08/29/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 29, 2004 at 10:54:33, Dan Honeycutt wrote: >On August 29, 2004 at 08:07:37, Uri Blass wrote: > >>In the case of computers 2 processors can achieve near 50 elo improvement >>relative to one processor. >> >>I think that it may be interesting to know how much can be achieved by humans. >> >>If 2 humans with equal rating have the right to consult during the game then >>what is going to be the rating of the team in the best case? >> >>Assume for the discussion time control of 90 minutes per game+30 seconds per >>move. >> >>Unfrtunately 2 humans are not allowed to register to tournaments as a team so we >>do not know answer to that question. >> >>I think that it will be good if chess federations allow team of humans to get a >>rating. >> >>There is a rule that writing notes is not allowed during games even without >>consulting. >>Disturbing the opponents by noise is also not allowed so the team has to consult >>by agreed languages of signs. >> >>I think also that it may be more interesting to have team of humans against team >>of processors. >> >>it is not fair that only computers has the right to consult by doing parallel >>search when human opponents have not right to consult by the same way when one >>human analyze line A and another human analyze line B. >> >>Uri > >With two processors you don't have the risk that one will decide that the other >is an idiot, get angry and refuse to play. > >Dan H. There are also people who understand that it is only a game and will not refuse to play because of a mistake of their partner. Good team of humans can agree about who is the boss in case of a disagreement. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.