Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 01:28:00 08/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 29, 2004 at 21:27:55, Robert Hyatt wrote: >But to Vincent, once again, please provide an exact quote with the source, or an >exact citation of a paper I wrote, where I made the statement you claimed I >made. All I claim is that you are a liar. > >Here's yet another case to join the JICCA paper you claimed I wrote, the CCC >posts you claimed I made, etc. > >The list is growing. > >Your credibility is shrinking. Why don't you just adopt the policy of not using >_my_ name with your nonsense? I don't exactly drop your name in every >conversation I hold. You ought to do the same. You'd look a lot less ignorant. 1. Why a "liar" should be interested in his "shrinking credibility"? 2. Why should he have the need of looking "less ignorant" if he can pull your triggers at will? That is as if someone would call you a witchhunter, just because you are relying on logic and significant data, in sum on science. Bob, you must realise that science alone has no _power_ other than in the institutions of science itself, so that you must exert power too if institutions or individuals _misuse_ science. Just _showing_ how "wrong" they are is just making them laugh. That is your dilemma in the cases of V. and ICGA. Paul H could tell you what was a recent third case. In all these examples we see people move who haven't to fear _something_ if they violate all logic and scientific decency. Who cares?! That is what they say. And they continue business as usual. Can't you get it? Don't you see that? Please!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.