Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 05:02:22 08/30/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 30, 2004 at 07:06:33, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On August 29, 2004 at 21:27:55, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>Here is a quote from ICC: >> >>quote on=================================================== >>DIEP(C DM)(64): because they claimed having 'solved' chess and people like hyatt >>supporting that indirectly (by saying that nothing ever can get better than that >>old program) >>quote off================================================== >> >>This is _another_ case where I want to see a _specific_ quote, or a specific >>citation for an article where I made that statement (nothing can ever get better >>than DB). I've never said it. I've never implied it. > >I don't know, Seems so! >but it seems quit easy to me to understand what he means. Not for the first time, but you should better trying to understand what real experts say! > >You're a well known for posting a lot here about how good DB was Yes, I read that. >and that >current programs aren't close to it yet etc etc. That was meant for the progs in 1997! > (I won't dig quotes but I >*am sure* there are lots to find) For sure, but what's in your mind, speak it out now. > >Nothing can ever get better -> I can understand him saying that given your >attitude in the past. Not, this is getting hilarious again, this is evil BS, so to speak. Bob is a scientist, understood, and he would NEVER say such gross nonsense. He never had in fact. But you are supporting here a man who is inventing such outright lies and you come h ere and assist in saying that from what Bob has written that could well be concluded. No, it can't! Prove it that it can. No, you cant prove it. Like you couldn't prove that LIST is a Crafty-Clone. >You've always minimized the current programs performance >compared to DB, without any factual basis most of the time. What? Say what? In 1997 Bob wasn't right? ROTFL > >Compare the statement to the "Samuels program has solved checkers" attitude >that the Chinook team coped with. > >Basically, this kind of posts are "masterpieces" by you, not so much by >Vincent, I fear. As I said, we have people who have nothing to really fear because they are far out of science. And then we have people like Bob or Paul H, and these people also have nothing to fear, but this is because the base all their statements on exact science. You are with Vincent in the other boat out there, that is correct. The boat of moonlight and fairy tales. I asked questions above. Try to prove your hilarious hypothesis! Otherwise sail on in that boat of fairy tales! > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.