Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Another Vincent "masterpiece

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 07:14:17 08/30/04

Go up one level in this thread


On August 30, 2004 at 03:44:45, Uri Blass wrote:

>On August 29, 2004 at 21:27:55, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>Here is a quote from ICC:
>>
>>quote on===================================================
>>DIEP(C DM)(64): because they claimed having 'solved' chess and people like hyatt
>>supporting that indirectly (by saying that nothing ever can get better than that
>>old program)
>>quote off==================================================
>>
>>This is _another_ case where I want to see a _specific_ quote, or a specific
>>citation for an article where I made that statement (nothing can ever get better
>>than DB).  I've never said it.  I've never implied it.  In fact, I have been
>>quoted more than once where I predicted that hardware would eventually take us
>>well beyond DB's speed/performance.
>>
>>My quote was that in 1997, it would take 10+ years for a micro-computer based
>>program to approach DB's speed.  Today I can hit 10M nodes per second on a quad
>>opteron, 20M on an 8-way.  Probably approaching 40M on a 16-way box.  That isn't
>>as fast as DB, but it is in the ballpark.  And I still have 3 more years on my
>>"prediction".  Next year AMD has promised a dual-core opteron, so that 16-way
>>box will instantly become a 32-way box.  80M if there is no clock speed
>>improvement, yet they say it will be faster via clock as well.  So 2007 may be
>>enough time to hit 200M roughly, if not more.
>
>I agree that vincent's claim had no basis but remember that there is a
>difference between better and faster.
>
>I do not believe that humans are close to writing the best software and
>I believe that improvement in software that is equivalent to being 100 times
>faster is possible.
>
>Uri

I _believe_ it is possible to search one node and play the best move possible.
But I am not sure it will ever happen.  In the case of DB, it seems pretty clear
that faster _was_ better, based on their results against GM players.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.