Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Hydra node speed from CSS forum

Author: Jorge Pichard

Date: 08:32:33 08/30/04

Go up one level in this thread


On August 30, 2004 at 09:41:26, Kurt Utzinger wrote:

>On August 30, 2004 at 09:18:47, Jorge Pichard wrote:
>
>>On August 30, 2004 at 09:03:38, Albert Silver wrote:
>>
>>>On August 30, 2004 at 08:30:34, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>>
>>>>On August 30, 2004 at 08:12:52, Jouni Uski wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Eine FPGA-Karte untersucht momentan ca. 3 Millionen Positionen/Sekunde. 16
>>>>>Karten machen daher theoretisch 48 MPos/sec. (Donninger)
>>>>>
>>>>>Jouni
>>>>
>>>>      If Hydra made 48 Mpos/sec this again proves (in comparison
>>>>      with the 2 Mpos/sec on Quad-Opteron server with 4 CPU's of
>>>>      Shredder) that the number of pos/sec can't be taken as a
>>>>      reliable value for the goodness of a chess program. It's
>>>>      of course simply impossible to compare apples and organes.
>>>>      Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com]
>>>
>>>It would be necessary to have more games played to really judge the relative
>>>strengths of the machines (software + hardware), but supposing the gain is 40
>>>Elo per ply at this point (diminishing returns) and that Hydra is gaining one
>>>ply per 3-fold speedup that would mean it is roughly 120-150 Elo stronger than
>>>Shredder on that hardware.
>>
>>The biggest problem that we have is that we don't really know if Hydra on a
>>comparable hardware is the same strenght as Shredder, therefore, to say that
>>Hyrdra is 120-150 Elo stronger than Shredder would be the wrong assumption.
>>Now if  you take the latest Nimzo and consider that it had four upgrades in
>>private and each upgrade equal to 40 Elo which is an increase of 160 Elo, than
>>we can say that Nimzo (Hydra )strength is almost equal to Shredder 8 on equal
>>hardware. Even if Hydra is a special program that run on parallel, I believe
>>that Dr. Donninger started from his own algorithm (clone Nimzo program) and
>>simply made several changes.
>
>      Hi Jorge
>      You might be wrong here. I guess that Hydra is a completely
>      new written program and not a simple "Nimzo-clone".
>      Kurt


Even if the program has to be re-written to make it able to accept distributed
clusters, the main idea behind Nimzo with a lot of modifications could still be
used by Dr.Donninger.

Jorge




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.