Author: Enrique Irazoqui
Date: 09:08:25 01/06/99
Go up one level in this thread
On January 06, 1999 at 11:45:58, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >On January 06, 1999 at 11:32:49, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: > >>On January 06, 1999 at 11:12:12, Ulrich Tuerke wrote: >> >>> >>>I think this should be fully a joke. Of course, a prog with a very small book >>>will very painfully react on book preparations by the opponent (manually or >>>automatically) because its replies can be predicted by playing a few games. >>>I'd bet that even a very strong engine like Tiger will suffer in this case >>>heavily against a strong book learner when playing a few dozen games. >> >>It is not happening... and you lost your bet. What was it? :) > >Suggestions ? Modest: a Ferrari F-50? In Spain the 6th of January we celebrate the Magic Kings. Many presents for children of all ages... Thanks. :) Enrique >>So far Tiger has played 90 games against 9 opponents with strong and aggressive >>learners, and it got away with murder (no learner, practically no book). Before >>entering Tiger and when Christophe told me it had no learner, I thought it would >>be massacred, but it isn't. >> >>Enrique >> >>>(However, Tiger might very well dominate a considerably weaker learner, because >>>the learning won't work in case the learner can't score at all.) > >You are saying "it got away with murder"; so may be the above statement is true >here. > >Uli
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.