Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 14:30:16 08/31/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 31, 2004 at 16:21:46, martin fierz wrote:
>On August 31, 2004 at 09:33:11, WAEL DEEB wrote:
>
>>Hi Jorge,
>>I haven't install and played with Muse yet,but it seems to have some serious
>>weak spots in it's opening book!
>
>
>just for confirmation, muse does not have these lines in its opening book, and
>taking a quick look they are really crap. i don't see the point of using a
>common book for all engines if it is this bad! IMO there are 3 sensible options
>to test:
>-> engine uses own book
>-> no book, X selected starting positions (like nunn match)
>-> all engines use a common but small book with no losing lines in
>
>tournaments with books where one engine gets out of the opening in a lost
>position are partially useless. unless the author provided such a book of course
>:-)
>
>cheers
> martin
Jorge is a dead loss :)
He will probably never learn to use decent books and book settings.
I have noticed a strange opening move from one of his posts some days ago.
You actually don´t need a board to spot them.
[Event "Arena tournament"]
[Site "S0025128408"]
[Date "2004.08.28"]
[Round "1"]
[White "Booot41"]
[Black "Fafis"]
[Result "1-0"]
[Time "18:18:00"]
[TimeControl "900+0"]
[Termination "normal"]
[PlyCount "93"]
[WhiteType "program"]
[BlackType "program"]
1.c4 e6 2.Nc3 Nc6 3.g3 d5 4.cxd5 exd5 5.Nf3 Nf6 6.Qa4 d4 7.Nb5 Bc5 8.Bg2
{-0.61/10 36} O-O {+0.76/10 22} 9.O-O {-0.66/10 34} Be6 {+0.38/10 22} 10.e3
{-0.26/10 33}
d3 {+0.39/10 21} 11.Ng5 {-0.14/10 26} Qd7 {+0.12/10 20} 12.Nxe6 {-0.09/10 30}
fxe6
{+0.37/11 20} 13.Qc4 {-0.09/10 29} Bb6 {+0.35/11 19} 14.Nc3 {0.00/10 28} Rab8
{+0.38/10
19} 15.b3 {+0.09/10 27} Ne5 {+0.30/10 18} 16.Qh4 {+0.13/10 26} Nd5 {+0.31/9 18}
17.Qe4 {+0.70/10 25} Nxc3 {+0.02/10 17} 18.dxc3 {+0.70/10 24} Nf7 {-0.78/10 17}
19.Rd1
{+1.31/10 23} Rbd8 {-0.13/9 17} 20.Qxb7 {+1.24/10 22} Qb5 {-0.17/9 16} 21.Ba3
{+1.37/10
16} c5 {-0.12/10 16} 22.Qe4 {+1.44/10 18} Rd6 {-0.12/10 15} 23.Rd2 {+1.54/10 19}
Rfd8 {-0.17/10 15} 24.Bb2 {+1.71/10 14} Qd7 {-0.48/9 15} 25.Rad1 {+2.27/10 18}
c4
{-2.81/10 14} 26.Ba3 {+3.58/10 17} Ba5 {-2.82/10 14} 27.Qxc4 {+3.41/11 17} Ne5
{-2.90/11
13} 28.Qc5 {+3.73/11 16} Rd5 {-2.80/12 13} 29.Bxd5 {+4.09/12 15} Qxd5 {-3.16/11
4}
30.Qxd5 {+4.17/12 15} Rxd5 {-3.39/12 13} 31.c4 {+4.21/12 14} Rd7 {-3.66/12 13}
32.Rb2
{+4.25/11 11} Bc3 {-3.69/11 12} 33.Rbb1 {+4.38/10 13} a6 {-3.88/10 12} 34.Bb2
{+4.92/12
12} Bxb2 {-4.86/12 11} 35.Rxb2 {+5.01/12 11} g5 {-4.96/12 11} 36.f4 {+5.96/12
11}
Nf3+ {-5.38/13 11} 37.Kf2 {+6.28/12 11} g4 {-5.37/13 10} 38.b4 {+6.58/11 11} Kf7
{-5.81/10 10} 39.b5 {+6.86/10 10} axb5 {-6.81/11 10} 40.cxb5 {+7.43/11 8} Nxh2
{-7.24/11
10} 41.b6 {+9.12/11 9} Rd8 {-8.75/12 9} 42.b7 {+9.82/11 7} Rb8 {-8.87/11 9}
43.Rxd3
{+10.56/12 9} Nf3 {-9.78/12 9} 44.Rc3 {+11.45/12 8} Kf6 {-10.93/13 9} 45.Rc8
{+12.25/11 8}
Rxb7 {-10.93/11 8} 46.Rxb7 {+12.26/10 8} Nd2 {-11.07/10 8} {1-0 Arena
Adjudication} 1-0
[D] r1bqkb1r/ppp2ppp/2n2n2/3p4/8/2N2NP1/PP1PPP1P/R1BQKB1R w KQkq - 0 6
6.Qa4
Out of curiosity, I searched my database with over 3 million games to see who
would play this move here.
I couldn´t find a single game. :)
The move 2...Nc6 is also very popular. :)
Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.