Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 19:18:40 08/31/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 31, 2004 at 21:58:14, stuart taylor wrote: >On August 31, 2004 at 21:31:33, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > >> >>>[d]2kr3r/ppp1qpp1/2p5/2b2b1p/2P1pPn1/1P2P1PP/PBQPB3/RN2K2R b KQ - 0 12 >>> >>>12.h4!! >> >>AMD barton @3000+ >> >>Time Depth Score Positions Moves >>0:00 1/8 -0.77 176924 12...Nf6 13.a3 Qe6 14.b4 Be7 15.Bf1 >> Qd7 16.Nc3 >>0:01 1/9 -0.82 427947 12...Nf6 13.a3 Qe6 14.b4 Be7 15.Bf1 >> Qd7 16.Nc3 Kb8 >>0:06 1/10 -0.78 1327528 12...Nf6 13.a3 Qe6 14.Bf1 Be7 15.Nc3 >> Kb8 16.O-O-O Bc5 17.Kb1 >>0:16 1/11 -0.71 4242963 12...Nf6 13.a3 Qe6 14.Bf1 Be7 15.Nc3 >> Kb8 16.O-O-O c5 17.Bg2 h4 >>0:33 1/11 -0.92 8541987 12...h4 13.Bxg4 Bxg4 14.hxg4 hxg3 >> 15.Rg1 Rh2 16.Qc3 Qh4 17.Qxg7 Rh1 >> 18.Rxh1 Qxh1+ 19.Ke2 Bxe3 >>1:21 1/12 -1.75 20461179 12...h4 13.Bxg4 Bxg4 14.hxg4 hxg3 >> 15.Rg1 Rh2 16.Nc3 Bxe3 17.O-O-O >> Bxg1 18.Rxg1 Rdxd2 19.Qxd2 Rxd2 >> 20.Kxd2 Qd6+ 21.Kc2 Qxf4 >>2:43 1/13 -1.72 42207857 12...h4 13.Bxg4 Bxg4 14.hxg4 hxg3 >> 15.Rg1 Rh2 16.Nc3 Rdxd2 17.Qxd2 >> Rxd2 18.Kxd2 Qd8+ 19.Ke1 Bxe3 20.Rg2 >> Bf2+ 21.Kf1 Qd2 22.Rd1 Qxb2 23.Nxe4 >> Qxa2 24.Nxf2 gxf2 > It's the king 3.33 (chessmaster 10th edition) and an AMD barton @ 180 mhz*12 (2.16 Ghz) It play 13.Bxg4 in the mainline because it see 13.hxg4 is completely losing more later ... >Huh? That's quick! However, I would be even more impressed if I would see that >it found 14....Rh1 or 15....Rh1 from the same position in a short time. >Could you test it for that? >And what kind of AMD and Mhz are you using? > > >[Later, I would be staggeringly fascinated to know if your computer EVER arrives >at the (possibly best moves) of 10...Ng4 and/or 11...h5. If so, I might even >propose that computers have almost solved chess!] > >Thanks! >S.Taylor
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.