Author: Chris Welty
Date: 00:30:42 09/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 01, 2004 at 00:51:47, Stuart Cracraft wrote: >I know this is a long shot throwing this out there without much more >info, but perhaps I'll get lucky and someone has seen this before. >It's appeared on this bulletin board about 6 years ago. > >[D]4r1k1/p1qr1p2/2pb1Bp1/1p5p/3P1n1R/1B3P2/PP3PK1/2Q4R w - - bm Qxf4; id >"WAC.141"; > >without mate threat code >10/46 g2f1 471.92 -825 92873175 g2f1 e8b8 h1g1 f4e6 h4h5 >11/46> g2f1 666.85 -575 133140320 g2f1 e8b8 h1g1 f4e6 h4h5 Perhaps the problem's not in the mate threat extension but somewhere else? When Altamax sees Qxf4 the PV is only 10 ply long: 6 347 0 196349 Qxf4 Bxf4 Rxh5 gxh5 Rxh5 Bh6 Rxh6 Qg3+ Kxg3 Kf8 196kn /2.80s = 70.2kn/s >P.S. The program is solving 241/300 on WAC on the same slow 1ghz p3 and at >the same 1 second per position setting that Crafty 19.16 gets 270/300 on -- >fun since only was 175/300 a couple months ago and the program is less than 5 >months old. Also recently up from expert score on IQ4 to master. Did not code >specifically for any given position other than one in WAC (141 is the second.) >I did not look at the positions beyond the first couple and avoided looking at >the printout except the summary/stats. Position printout was disabled, etc., >etc. 241/300 sounds pretty good!
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.