Author: Graham Banks
Date: 11:57:24 09/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 01, 2004 at 10:58:44, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On September 01, 2004 at 10:00:50, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>Hi Graham >>Still a much worse score of Crafty 19.15 in your tournament >>ompared with [http://www.utzingerk.com/at_2004.htm]. Could it >>be that the native Crafty plays weaker than the WB version? >>Or does Crafty not like the book you have chosen? Questions >>about questions. And one thing: the result of CM9 Judge II >>is just weird. > > Why it is weird? Because of the amazing 80% performance? I find it rather >difficult to happen also, but i trust Graham for being honest to it's results. >In fact it is one of the most amazing performances, along with CM9000_SKR at >it's early days, i have ever seen. Hi George, the results are genuine. Could just be a fluke result. My brother Ray is running matches on his dual Athlon 2800 involving TO5, Assassin, Judge II and R1 (what I consider the four strongest CM9000 personalities) against Shredder 8, Deep Fritz 8, Chess Tiger 15, Junior 8 and Hiarcs 9 at 40/40 and 40/120. This will take a while, so we'll hold off posting results at this stage. Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.