Author: Vincent Lejeune
Date: 00:43:50 09/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 01, 2004 at 19:53:53, stuart taylor wrote: > >I would be very interested in the "more later", if possible. Maybe the computers >which get h4 quick sometimes change their mind, and then come back again to h4 >with much more certainty. I've seen that happen from this position. I'll let Chessmaster think on it next night (reponse in 24 from now) I'm reposting all the test positions, with comments : find h4! and don't lose it after 15 min [d]2kr3r/ppp1qpp1/2p5/2b2b1p/2P1pPn1/1P2P1PP/PBQPB3/RN2K2R b KQ - 0 12 > >It might even be that there is stronger variation against 13.Bxg4, and best >would be 13.Rg1. what's the best move here (after 12...h4) ? [d]2kr3r/ppp1qpp1/2p5/2b2b2/2P1pPnp/1P2P1PP/PBQPB3/RN2K2R w KQ - 0 13 > >I'm also still interested about 10....Ng4 find 10...Ng4 [d]2kr3r/ppp1qppp/2p2n2/2b2b2/2P1pP2/1P2P3/PBQPB1PP/RN2K2R b KQ f3 0 10 >and 11....h5, although I doubt very >much in a computer ever playing them, even if they are tactically very great. find 11...h5 [d]2kr3r/ppp1qppp/2p5/2b2b2/2P1pPn1/1P2P1P1/PBQPB2P/RN2K2R b KQ - 0 11 >> >>>Huh? That's quick! However, I would be even more impressed if I would see that >>>it found 14....Rh1 or 15....Rh1 from the same position in a short time. >>>Could you test it for that? >>>And what kind of AMD and Mhz are you using? >>> >>> >>>[Later, I would be staggeringly fascinated to know if your computer EVER arrives >>>at the (possibly best moves) of 10...Ng4 and/or 11...h5. If so, I might even >>>propose that computers have almost solved chess!] >>> >>>Thanks! >>>S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.