Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 03:08:52 09/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 01, 2004 at 19:58:34, stuart taylor wrote:
>On September 01, 2004 at 00:44:37, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>
>>On August 31, 2004 at 19:00:36, van baker wrote:
>>
>>>Did they talk about the CM 10k yet?
>>>Is it worth the upgrade, still have mentor lines,
>>>sronger than previous versions, and require disk alot and will it
>>>be tested and rated soon?
>>>
>>>Thx for any feedback, Van
>>
>> Test results of The King 3.33 (40'/40) can be found at
>> [http://www.utzingerk.com/cm10k.htm]
>> Kurt
>
>Thanks, Kurt!
>And what prospects do you think there are in CM 10 having a great setting which
>will be above the best settings for CM 9?
>S.Taylor
Hi Stuart
I have really no idea ... and being somewhat fed up with
tuning The King I am this time not the one to try other
settings for the CM10k. Should somebody come up with a
test over 300-500 games (of course not blitz) and pretty
good results I may perhaps try out such a setting. But
I won't play games with settings that have not been
tested very thoroughly at time control 40'/40 or slower
vs at least 8-10 other engines. It's no fun to have 100
and more settings (like for CM9k) but only 3-5 of them
which bring reliable good results.
Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com]
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.