Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:06:05 09/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 2004 at 08:00:57, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On September 02, 2004 at 07:43:29, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On September 01, 2004 at 15:07:06, Jorge Pichard wrote: >> >>>On September 01, 2004 at 11:40:32, Igor Gorelikov wrote: >>> >>>>On September 01, 2004 at 09:36:17, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi Igor >>>>>A somewhat disappointing score of List_512 with >>>>>three (3) won and seven (7) lost matches. Which >>>>>was the book used for Fritz Reul's engine. BTW: >>>>>great tournamant, please keep up your good work. >>>>>Regards >>>>>Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com] >>>> >>>>List doesn't have its own book, so it plays without book. >>>> >>>>Igor >>> >>> >>>Any program without an opening book, no matter how strong it is, will play at >>>least 40 Elo rating lower. Therefore, please provide List512 an Opening Book. >>> >>>Jorge >> >>I disagree. >> >>If the program can find the better opening moves by search then it can play >>better with no opening book. >> >>It is also possible that a program without opening book can go to positions that >>it understand better relative to book positions. >> >>Uri > > >Can you tell me which program you have in mind that can play better without >opening book. I can test your program movei with Dann Opening book, versus movei >without an opening book. I will not expect more than 45% out of 40 games for >Movei W/O Opening against Movei with Opening. Now is there any other program >that you have in mind? > >Jorge I have no specific program in mind and I am sure that with no learning programs with no book can practically lose every game in a long match after enough games. Uri Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.