Author: stuart taylor
Date: 10:56:58 09/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 2004 at 06:08:52, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On September 01, 2004 at 19:58:34, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On September 01, 2004 at 00:44:37, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On August 31, 2004 at 19:00:36, van baker wrote: >>> >>>>Did they talk about the CM 10k yet? >>>>Is it worth the upgrade, still have mentor lines, >>>>sronger than previous versions, and require disk alot and will it >>>>be tested and rated soon? >>>> >>>>Thx for any feedback, Van >>> >>> Test results of The King 3.33 (40'/40) can be found at >>> [http://www.utzingerk.com/cm10k.htm] >>> Kurt >> >>Thanks, Kurt! >>And what prospects do you think there are in CM 10 having a great setting which >>will be above the best settings for CM 9? >>S.Taylor > > Hi Stuart > I have really no idea ... and being somewhat fed up with > tuning The King I am this time not the one to try other > settings for the CM10k. Should somebody come up with a > test over 300-500 games (of course not blitz) and pretty > good results I may perhaps try out such a setting. But > I won't play games with settings that have not been > tested very thoroughly at time control 40'/40 or slower > vs at least 8-10 other engines. It's no fun to have 100 > and more settings (like for CM9k) but only 3-5 of them > which bring reliable good results. > Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com] > > Kurt I really hope another person will do the job as good as you can. You certainly made alot of people happy! You ought to have been paid. S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.