Author: Graham Banks
Date: 11:47:03 09/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 2004 at 14:01:34, stuart taylor wrote: >On September 02, 2004 at 03:29:55, Graham Banks wrote: > >>On September 01, 2004 at 19:58:34, stuart taylor wrote: >> >>>On September 01, 2004 at 00:44:37, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>> >>>>On August 31, 2004 at 19:00:36, van baker wrote: >>>> >>>>>Did they talk about the CM 10k yet? >>>>>Is it worth the upgrade, still have mentor lines, >>>>>sronger than previous versions, and require disk alot and will it >>>>>be tested and rated soon? >>>>> >>>>>Thx for any feedback, Van >>>> >>>> Test results of The King 3.33 (40'/40) can be found at >>>> [http://www.utzingerk.com/cm10k.htm] >>>> Kurt >>> >>>Thanks, Kurt! >>>And what prospects do you think there are in CM 10 having a great setting which >>>will be above the best settings for CM 9? >>>S.Taylor >> >>Should be possible theoretically! >>Stay tuned. >>Graham. > >Is the playing strength capacity of CM10 greater than that of CM9? If so, then >I'm very much looking forward to what people come up with. >S.Taylor CM 10th Edition default is definitely stronger than CM9000 default, so it should be possible to tweak the strength accordingly. Graham.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.