Author: stuart taylor
Date: 19:00:15 09/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 02, 2004 at 14:47:03, Graham Banks wrote: >On September 02, 2004 at 14:01:34, stuart taylor wrote: > >>On September 02, 2004 at 03:29:55, Graham Banks wrote: >> >>>On September 01, 2004 at 19:58:34, stuart taylor wrote: >>> >>>>On September 01, 2004 at 00:44:37, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >>>> >>>>>On August 31, 2004 at 19:00:36, van baker wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Did they talk about the CM 10k yet? >>>>>>Is it worth the upgrade, still have mentor lines, >>>>>>sronger than previous versions, and require disk alot and will it >>>>>>be tested and rated soon? >>>>>> >>>>>>Thx for any feedback, Van >>>>> >>>>> Test results of The King 3.33 (40'/40) can be found at >>>>> [http://www.utzingerk.com/cm10k.htm] >>>>> Kurt >>>> >>>>Thanks, Kurt! >>>>And what prospects do you think there are in CM 10 having a great setting which >>>>will be above the best settings for CM 9? >>>>S.Taylor >>> >>>Should be possible theoretically! >>>Stay tuned. >>>Graham. >> >>Is the playing strength capacity of CM10 greater than that of CM9? If so, then >>I'm very much looking forward to what people come up with. >>S.Taylor > > >CM 10th Edition default is definitely stronger than CM9000 default, so it should >be possible to tweak the strength accordingly. >Graham. But the default might have been tweeked better in the furst place (than the CM9 was) S.Taylor
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.