Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Pro Deo in Arena

Author: Frank Quisinsky

Date: 04:09:02 09/03/04

Go up one level in this thread


On September 03, 2004 at 05:36:21, Odd Gunnar Malin wrote:

>On September 03, 2004 at 03:54:42, Frank Quisinsky wrote:
>
>>On September 03, 2004 at 03:09:25, Odd Gunnar Malin wrote:
>>
>>Hello Odd,
>>
>>>For me it just as much an interface question that could interest all programmers
>>>who create gui's etc. Also for engineauthors it could be of interest because
>>>some bugs/special use of a protocol could be easly repaired in an engine. Like
>>>this issue in question, if the engine smell on broken pipe (returning error from
>>>read/readfile) it can take the itself down the correct way.
>>
>>I think so if you look in your own work.
>>
>>>If the Arena author want to share some of his thought he is more than welcome
>>>into this forum.
>>
>>And welcome into other forums ...
>>And this is the problem we have with computer chess fora.
>>
>>Today we have a lot of fora systems. In the case of Arena (free development,
>>everyone can help us, open bug list and so on) it's more interesting to used an
>>own forum to do it. We can collect the important messages and have all in one.
>>For a bigger programmer team perhaps not interestig but Martin go the way of the
>>programming alone and have not to search if he is sitting on his PC and try to
>>improved his program. To search in other fora for interesting messages is a lot
>>of work. Nothing to do with CCC or other chess fora. I like CCC and other fora
>>but the way we go is in my opinion right and we have success with it.
>>
>>>Also, testing your own creature against beta's isn't something you normaly do so
>>>it isn't important for me to have access to the latest beta version of a gui.
>>>
>>>The reason I don't play with Arena myself is because I almost only play games as
>>>human against engines and the nasty deley when you try to move a piece have
>>>stoped me to go any further. For the few engnine-engine matches I do I'm more
>>>than pleased with Winboard and the Ert tool.
>>
>>I like Winboard a lot :-)
>>Since two years I have not installed WinBoard because I am blessed with Arena.
>>It's right that beta versions are "only" actual development versions and not so
>>important. More important are the final results, the release version. At the
>>moment Martin worked on Arena 1.1 and try to fix only bugs.
>>
>>I have also a lot of fun with Arena and own games. Used a DGT board and for me
>>is important that the DGT clock XP works better. The most important point for
>>myself and Martin will do it after the release version of Arena 1.1.
>>
>
>I thought he used the new dgtebdll from dgtprojects. If he want (and not using a
>borland compiler because the the samples from DGT should be enough then) he can
>take a peek at this file:
>http://home.online.no/~malin/sjakk/download/dgtebdllsamples.zip
>
>>>>This means not that you "Must" send bugs, impressions, wishes and so on.
>>>>This means that you can send anything if you have time to make it.
>>>
>>>Ok, I missunderstand some messages from you. I thought I read that you
>>>threatened to delete users that didn't give response some months back.
>>
>>Yes, this is right!
>>Different reasons to do it. The most have to do with an easy administration and
>>with security. We have with passwords system a lot of security problems.
>>Password sharing is for us not very good and the owner of Parsimony don't like
>>it and closed much fora with the reason "Password sharing". It's possible that
>>the idea to delete non active members after an half year is not good.
>>
>>After the reorganisation last year we deleted all passwords, create a new
>>concept (ASA) and started again. Today the forum have new ideas and the work by
>>the Admins are very good (I am not longer Admin in Arena Support Forum). The
>>most important point is the Arena development to make Arena stronger and since
>>the reorganisation Arena made bigger jumpings because all is more effective.
>>This forum is very very important for us, not for hits or to be the biggest ...
>>important for the development of Arena. We have in this forum not to many OT
>>discuss, not to many provocations and we must not delete to many messages. In
>>the latest years we delete around 3 threads and perhaps 10 messages.
>>
>>>Odd Gunnar
>>
>>Sorry for my long answer in bad English ...
>>Have a nice day!
>>
>>Best
>>Frank
>>
>>PS: I know it, Arena don't need your adapter and you have no interest :-)
>>No, no just a joke ... your adapter is great for a lot of persons and the work
>>you do is really good. You must have some knowledge about the protocols and
>>perhaps you are one of the persons to have interest to write with others in a
>>group a strong new version of WinBoard protocol III. I believe it must be
>>possible to use the screen information UCI have directly with a newer WinBoard
>>protocol.
>
>Ok :)
>
>I just want to explain why I'm not so keen to participate active in other forum.
>My main (free) work for the chess community is more directed towards human
>players.
>Here is a list what I work active on now:
>
>http://norbase.sjakk.biz/index.php?lang=en
>- I do all the work except creating the games in electronic format, though I
>have made some thousand of those too.
>
>http://vadsosjakk.no/
>- Norwegian chessclub site. I have made all the programming part (php/sql) so a
>writer can add articles/picture etc. direct from his browser.
>
>http://polarchess.sjakk.biz/index.php?lang=en
>- My ideas to make a tool for helping people to learn chess.
>
>A graphical tool to help a webmaster to do web-updates of crosstables etc. under
>an ongoing tournament. Eg. add a result and do a click and all is updated on the
>web. I havent released any betas of this.
>A sample result could be watched here:
>http://vadsosjakk.no/vds/04/index.php?page=arkiv&newsid=115
>When a game exist in a pgn-file it is also clickable in the cross-table for
>playing through.
>
>Odd Gunnar

Hi Odd,

wow ...
I read your other message too!

All what I saw looks very intersting for me. The webpage looks like great, much
better as the Arena page. We have to think about a new design, all is a little
bit old and your site is much impressive. I have a longer time no look in your
engine and chess develops. In the past I work on Frank's Chess Page ... I am
sure ... I know all what you make, have my eyes on every intersting site :-)

What you write here is an interesting message for Arena News-Ticker too. Your
name is know in the computer chess area and the community will have each of such
informaiton.

The time, the time ... that's really the problem I have. So much interesting
pages and in the past, you know this ... in Norway we had in the past not a
really good chess webpage. The most are looking on the big Swedish webpage
(forget the name, not longer available since around one year). I got this
information from different persons in the first years of my info page. I search
in this time links from Norway for my link selection (also not longer
available).

...

I sent the information to the DGT clock XP in a mail to Martin!

Wish you good luck with your ideas, I believe I like all but I have not look in
detail. Will do it in the evening, so far the childrens are in the near.

Have a nice weekend!

Best
Frank



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.