Author: Antonio Dieguez
Date: 08:22:22 09/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 03, 2004 at 11:02:24, Tord Romstad wrote: >On September 03, 2004 at 10:48:53, Richard Pijl wrote: > >>On September 03, 2004 at 10:39:27, Tord Romstad wrote: >> >>> null_value = -search(-beta, -(beta+1), depth-(R+1)*PLY); >> >>I hope you meant to say -beta, -beta+1 :-) > >Argh. Yet another stupid mistake. You are right, I meant to write: > > null_value = -search(-beta, -(beta-1), depth-(R+1)*PLY); and why not for clearness null_value = -search (beta-1, beta, depth-(R+1)*PLY); I find it very usefull, only needing to make the correction at the top of search, but it is worth the shame imho.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.