Author: Axel Schumacher
Date: 12:53:23 09/03/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 03, 2004 at 12:02:17, Thomas Logan wrote: >On September 02, 2004 at 22:16:23, Axel Schumacher wrote: > >> >>The latest Elo (Top 20): >> >>1 CM10k Schumacher 2835 377 >>2 Deep Fritz 7 2815 1816 >>3 CM9000 R2 2807 215 >>4 Hiarcs 9 2802 1044 >>5 Fritz 8.0.0.5 2802 713 >>6 Fritz 8.0.0.26 2802 487 >>7 CM9000 R1 2801 524 >>8 Fritz 8.0.0.23 2798 357 >>9 Fritz 8.0.0.19 2794 512 >>10 Fritz 8.0.0.8 2794 224 >>11 Fritz 7.0.0.8 2792 913 >>12 CM9000 Surak8c 2792 522 >>13 CM10k BUC 2792 233 >>14 CM10k Schumacher1b 2792 69 >>15 Deep Fritz 8 2788 965 >>16 Hiarcs8 Bareev 2782 529 >>17 CM9000 BUC-Blitz 2781 455 >>18 Ruffian 2003-05-06 2781 323 >>19 Chess Tiger 14.0 2780 3246 >>20 Shredder 8 2778 963 > >Any idea why Chessmaster fairs so well in your test compared to others > >And Shredder does so poorly > >Shredder # 20 seems extremely odd > >Tom I don't think it's odd. First, the good performance of CM is simply explained by the number of tested personalities. I tested about 200. 195 did not make it into the Top 20. Secondly, Shredder seems far behind, but that is misleading, since this specific list contains multiple versions of the same engine. Basically, the Top 6 engines looks like this: 1 CM10k Schumacher 2835 377 2 Deep Fritz 7 2815 1816 3 Hiarcs 9 2802 1044 4 Ruffian 2781 323 5 Chess Tiger 14.0 2780 3246 6 Shredder 8 2778 963 Shredder lost horribly to CM Schumacher, so it dropped quite a bit; it will probably recover to get back to Rank 4, just behind Hiarcs 9. Also, Shreder is not the best Blitzer, it performs much better at longer time-controls. Axel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.