Author: David Dahlem
Date: 08:50:18 09/04/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 04, 2004 at 11:21:15, Norm Pollock wrote: >On September 04, 2004 at 10:05:45, David Dahlem wrote: > >>On September 04, 2004 at 09:13:19, Norm Pollock wrote: >> >>>Many engines, such as Ruffian, are both WB and UCI. Which method of >>>installation, WB with wb2uci, or UCI, will give a stronger engine in the Fritz8 >>>gui? >> >>I don't have any evidence to verify my opinion, but i just don't see how using >>an adapter to install a WB/UCI engine as UCI could give a stronger engine. >> >>Regards >>Dave >> > >Suppose an engine starts life as a WB engine and then the author internally puts >in an adapter to make it a dual WB-UCI engine. Wouldn't, in this case, using an >adapter like wb2uci possibly be better? That's a whole different question. I suppose it would depend on how well the author internally implemented the adapter. :-) Regards Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.