Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 08:30:17 09/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2004 at 11:21:10, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >On September 05, 2004 at 11:06:45, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>On September 05, 2004 at 10:51:34, Kurt Utzinger wrote: >> >>>On September 05, 2004 at 09:29:11, Jorge Pichard wrote: >>> >>>>I decided to continue the first match up to 30 games between Shredder 8 without >>>>opening versus Aristarch 4.50 with opening at G/60. The last game # 30 seem to >>>>be heading to a draw which will make the final score 16 to 14, unless Shredder 8 >>>>pull out another endgame trick. >>>> >>>>http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?385745 >>> >>> >>> Hi Jorge >>> Interesting experiment indeed. And what is your >>> conclusion? >>> Kurt >> >>Aristarch 4.50 won the last game, with an inpressive score of 14.5 out of >>30. I thought that Shredder 8 without its Shredder.ctg opening book was going to >>win with a bigger margin, since the opening doesn't make much of a difference >>with a good engine like shredder 8 that has good learning. It could be that >>shredder 8 opening worth as much as 55 to 65 rating points. We can only find out >>how strong Aristach 4.50 really is, if the SSDF decide to test Aristarch 4.50. >>My prediction is that it could be around 2675 at standard SSDF time control. >> >>Jorge > > > Hi Jorge > About strength of Aristarch 4.50 at 90m+30s please > have a look at our AT 2004 tournament > [http://www.utzingerk.com/at_2004.htm] > Kurt Thanks Kurt, that reasure my previous belief that Aristarch 4.50 performs better at longer time control, even with my short match of 22 games at G/30 against Shredder 8 it performed worse than at G/60. Jorge
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.