Author: Günther Simon
Date: 16:32:50 09/05/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2004 at 19:27:49, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 05, 2004 at 19:17:24, Günther Simon wrote: > >>On September 05, 2004 at 19:04:48, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On September 05, 2004 at 18:55:53, Günther Simon wrote: >>> >>>>On September 04, 2004 at 11:46:48, Ed Schröder wrote: >>>> >>>>>Does someone possess a good test set for testing Perpetual Checks ? >>>>> >>>>>Thanks. >>>>> >>>>>Ed >>>> >>>> >>>>Well may be this one is too difficult for all current programs ;) >>>>For the record, this game really happened just one hour ago >>>>in a RWBC test tourney with live broadcast. >>>>Humans immediately see the draw I guess... >>>>The prog with Black resigned a few moves after it saced the first rook >>>>and started to check. May be with resign off it would have played >>>>alright until 50 moves rule? (Resign was -8) >>>> >>>>[D] 7k/R5R1/8/3r3P/3r3K/5P2/6P1/8 w - - 0 59 >>> >>>No draw >>>Movei finds the line >>> >>>g4 Rxg4+ Rxg4 Rxh5+ Kg3 Rh3+ Kf4 Rxf3+ Ke4 Re3+ Kd4 Rd3+ Kc4 Rc3+ Kb5 Rc5+ Ka4 >>> >>>Uri >> >>Movei is wrong. >> >>Günther > >No > >g4 Rxg4+ is the only check > >Rxh5+ Kxh5 Rd5+(only check) Rg5 Rxg5+ Kxg5 no stalemate > >later it is easy for me to see that black moves are the only checks and in the >end after Ka4 white can take with the rook to avoid stalemate. > >Uri You are right I missed you had Rxg4 instead of Kxg4 your PV, sorry. Then we have to cancel the double sac and return to a position which really happened later: [D] 7k/R5R1/8/3r3P/6K1/5P2/8/8 b - - 0 60
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.