Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why Are You Posting All This In CCC? To Win a Lost Arguement?

Author: Daniel Jackson

Date: 19:33:47 09/05/04

Go up one level in this thread


On September 05, 2004 at 22:20:38, Albert Silver wrote:

>
>>>A quick overlook now shows the posts of non-radicals (IMO) such as Bruce
>>>Moreland, Slater Wold, Ulrich Tuerke, Rolf Tueschen (who has changed quite a bit
>>>for those with old grudges BTW), Dann Corbit, Stephen Ham, jorge luis borges,
>>>Deepak Nityanandam, Graham Laight, Ingo Bauers, Thorsten Czub, Peter Berger,
>>>Amir Ban, Duncan Roberts, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba, Dan Andersson,
>>>Dimitris Poulos, Axel Schumacher, Ed Panek, Hristo, myself, etc. And of course,
>>>there are other members who I don't see just now, but are considered regulars
>>>such as Ed Schroeder, Fernando Villegas, and others.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>This is way off topic Albert, and just plain silly.
>
>If they don't like CTF and wish to voice their protest, that's fine. If it were
>only that, I might not have answered, but frankly the blanket judgement of CTF
>being 'filled' with hate, discrimination, and racism is a bit much to let by
>without a proper reply.
>
>It's not about winning an argument. To each their own, but misinformation
>shouldn't be left to stand uncountered.
>
>                                           Albert

Yes, I think the two should be seperate.

Secondly, over 90% of CTF is _filled_ with poison!

So your arguement is basicly moot....John is essentially accurate in his
depiction of CTF.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.