Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Why Are You Posting All This In CCC? To Win a Lost Arguement?

Author: Albert Silver

Date: 20:22:18 09/05/04

Go up one level in this thread


On September 05, 2004 at 22:33:47, Daniel Jackson wrote:

>On September 05, 2004 at 22:20:38, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>
>>>>A quick overlook now shows the posts of non-radicals (IMO) such as Bruce
>>>>Moreland, Slater Wold, Ulrich Tuerke, Rolf Tueschen (who has changed quite a bit
>>>>for those with old grudges BTW), Dann Corbit, Stephen Ham, jorge luis borges,
>>>>Deepak Nityanandam, Graham Laight, Ingo Bauers, Thorsten Czub, Peter Berger,
>>>>Amir Ban, Duncan Roberts, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba, Dan Andersson,
>>>>Dimitris Poulos, Axel Schumacher, Ed Panek, Hristo, myself, etc. And of course,
>>>>there are other members who I don't see just now, but are considered regulars
>>>>such as Ed Schroeder, Fernando Villegas, and others.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>This is way off topic Albert, and just plain silly.
>>
>>If they don't like CTF and wish to voice their protest, that's fine. If it were
>>only that, I might not have answered, but frankly the blanket judgement of CTF
>>being 'filled' with hate, discrimination, and racism is a bit much to let by
>>without a proper reply.
>>
>>It's not about winning an argument. To each their own, but misinformation
>>shouldn't be left to stand uncountered.
>>
>>                                           Albert
>
>Yes, I think the two should be seperate.

? They are separate.

>
>Secondly, over 90% of CTF is _filled_ with poison!
>

First of all, I don't agree, and sustained this with actual information. You
just added another blanket statement.

As to your comment of CTF being filled with poison strikes me as "The pot
calleth the kettle black". At least coming from someone who supports the idea of
bombing the capital of Chechnya, and then attacks Ulrich Tuerke ("get off your
high horse") for protesting this bloodthirsty idea.

                                         Albert

>So your arguement is basicly moot....John is essentially accurate in his
>depiction of CTF.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.