Author: Jason Kent
Date: 05:01:47 09/06/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 06, 2004 at 06:01:50, Jorge Pichard wrote: >On September 06, 2004 at 04:10:41, Kurt Utzinger wrote: > >>On September 06, 2004 at 03:24:05, WAEL DEEB wrote: >> >>>Hi Kurt, >>>Thank you for the fantastic,long-termed tournament! >>>Well,it looks like a very equal midlle field we have there :-) >>>I may recommend you in the future tournaments to use the new Wizard_v3_0 for >>>List,which will be released in the near future! >>>For more information,please take a look at my post in the news ticker on the >>>Arena web page later today! >>>Regards, >>>Dr.Wael Deeb >> >> >> List 5.12 has not done badly so far ... and in round >> 57 (9.1) it won and now stands equal with Aristarch 4.50 >> so I have no reason to blame the Runge-book for anything. >> On the other hand your new Wizard_v3_0 could perhaps be >> a good alternative for List in one of our coming tourneys. >> Regards >> Kurt [http://www.utzingerk.com] > >But how do we know that the New Wizard_v3_0 is better than the Runge-book or >Harry Schnapp Mainbook? > >Jorge All of the big books have some wild lines. I usually manually change some of the settings to get more accurate results. I like for at least two games to be played and at least one game won. These seem like minimum requirements for these huge books.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.