Author: Albert Silver
Date: 07:43:27 09/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
>>>1...Dc8 2.hxg6 Lxg5 3.Sxc4 Sxc4 4.g7 Te8 5.Lxg5 Df5+ 6.De4 Dxg5
>>> -+ (-1.52) Tiefe: 8 00:00:14 2409kN
>>>1...Sxb2 2.Lxb2 Lxg5 3.Sxg4 Sc4 4.hxg6 Sxb2
>>> -+ (-1.81) Tiefe: 8 00:00:21 3795kN
>>>1...Sxb2 2.Lxb2 Lxg5 3.Sxg4 Sc4 4.hxg6 fxg6 5.De4 Tf5 6.Sh6+ Lxh6 7.Txh6 Sxb2
>>> -+ (-2.01) Tiefe: 9 00:00:28 5116kN
>>>1...Sxb2 2.Lxb2 Lxg5 3.Sxg4 Sc4 4.hxg6 fxg6 5.De4 Tf5 6.Sh6+ Lxh6 7.Txh6
>>> -+ (-2.01) Tiefe: 10 00:00:48 9440kN
>>>1...Sxb2 2.hxg6
>>> -+ (-1.69) Tiefe: 11 00:02:32 33563kN
>>>1...gxf3 2.Dh4 Ta7 3.hxg6 fxg6 4.Th3
>>> -+ (-1.78) Tiefe: 11 00:04:16 57036kN
>>>
>>>(Nemeth, Privat 05.09.2004)
>>
>>Analysis by Pro Deo S&D v.4:
>>
>>1...Nxe3 2.Bxe3
>> -+ (-1.96) Depth: 1 00:00:00
>>1...gxf3
>> -+ (-3.67) Depth: 1 00:00:00
>>1...gxf3 2.h6 Bxg5
>> -+ (-3.80) Depth: 2 00:00:00
>>1...gxf3 2.h6 Kh8
>> -+ (-2.70) Depth: 3 00:00:00
>>1...gxh5 2.Rxh5 gxf3 3.Nf5 Nxd5
>> -+ (-3.67) Depth: 3 00:00:00
>>1...gxh5 2.fxg4 h4 3.Rxh4 Bxg5
>> -+ (-3.44) Depth: 4 00:00:00
>>1...gxh5 2.fxg4 hxg4 3.Nxg4 Nxd5 4.Qf1
>> -+ (-2.83) Depth: 5 00:00:00
>>1...gxf3 2.h6 f5 3.Nxc4 Nxc4 4.Rh4
>> -+ (-3.09) Depth: 5 00:00:00
>>1...gxf3 2.hxg6 fxg6 3.Qh4 Kf7 4.Nxc4 bxc4 5.Qe4
>> -+ (-3.28) Depth: 6 00:00:00 85kN
>>1...gxf3 2.h6 Kh7 3.Nxc4 Qxc4 4.Qe3 f2 5.Qxf2 Nxd5
>> -+ (-3.33) Depth: 7 00:00:00 194kN
>>1...gxf3 2.hxg6 fxg6 3.Qh4 Kf7 4.Qh7+ Ke8 5.Qxg6+ Rf7
>> -+ (-3.46) Depth: 8 00:00:00 382kN
>>1...gxf3 2.Qh4 Qc7 3.h6 f5 4.h7+ Kh8 5.Qh6 Qf7 6.Rdf1
>> -+ (-3.06) Depth: 9 00:00:04 3079kN
>>1...gxf3 2.Qh4 Qc7 3.Qh3 Nxa3+ 4.bxa3 Qxc3 5.Qxf3 Qb3+ 6.Ka1 Bxg5 7.hxg6
>> -+ (-3.15) Depth: 10 00:00:10 8373kN
>>1...gxf3 2.Qh4 Qc7 3.Ng4 Rc8 4.hxg6 fxg6 5.Nf6+ Bxf6 6.gxf6 Kf7 7.Rhg1 Rfe8
>> -+ (-2.55) Depth: 11 00:00:35 30664kN
>>1...gxf3 2.Qh4 Qc7 3.Ng4 Qd7 4.Nh6+ Kg7 5.Qe4 gxh5 6.Nf5+ Kg8 7.Qxf3
>> -+ (-2.31) Depth: 12 00:01:55 99330kN
>>1...gxf3 2.Qh4 Qc7 3.hxg6
>> -+ (-2.01) Depth: 13 00:06:30 352186kN
>>
>>(Silver, Private 05.09.2004)
>>
>> Albert
>
>
>Hallo Albert!
>
>Man kann nicht eine Position testen, und daraus eine Philosophie machen. Sonst
>müßte Fritz 8 hier ebenfalls passen (oder?) und in den Müll geworfen werden.
>
>Überhaupt: eine Partie oder Stellung sagt garnichts.
>
>English:
>
>
>One cannot test a position and make from this a philosophy. Otherwise Fritz 8
>would have to likewise fit here and throw into the garbage.
>
>At all: a game or a position does not say anything.
>
>Best,
>Eduard
>
Of course I agree, and in any case, I'm not judging your style as I have no
epxerience with it. I merely posted what I get with mine, the same way you might
post results of another engine. I'm having quite a bit of fun testing the
different parameters BTW. I might make one suggestion though: add
[Time Control = 125] * 125
[Time Control Status = ALWAYS] * ALWAYS|PB ONLY
I got annoyed at seeing PD lose so much in blitz *and* playing much faster, and
this has helped its results no matter what style is used.
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.