Author: Kurt Utzinger
Date: 10:34:04 09/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 2004 at 12:06:03, Christopher Morgan wrote:
>Eduard,
>
>Interesting results so far. Please post the settings.
>
>In recent tournaments posted here Aristarch 4.50 has had very strong results.
>On my AMD 64 3000+, 200MB hash, at 40' + 30", no tablebases (Pro Deo can’t use
>TBs), I have a 30 game match in Shredder 8 CB GUI, alternating colors, ponder
>off, Pro Deo 1.0 (Rebel 2 setting) v Aristarch 4.50 using the 15 Fischer Random
>Chess openings where the king and rooks (only) are in their classical starting
>chess positions so that normal rules of castling apply. CB/engines not set up
>to play true FRC, however, by using the 15 selected positions only you do get
>true FRC games. After ten games it’s 8-2 in favor of Pro Deo: Pro Deo 6 wins, 4
>draws, and no losses. Average length of the games is 64 moves which adds an
>additional 32 minutes to each engine clock making max game time for each
>engine’s thinking time about 72 minutes on average. I understand that both Pro
>Deo and Aristarch play better at longer time controls.
>
>This match should be a good test of pure engine strength. So far I am impressed
>with Pro Deo’s performance. I’ll post final results here and make games
>available to all.
>
>Chris
Hi Chris
Aristarch 4.50 does not seem to be an appropriate
opponent for Pro Deo 1.0 as you can see at
[http://www.utzingerk.com/pro_deo.htm]
Kurt
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.