Author: Steven Schwartz
Date: 16:34:56 09/07/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 07, 2004 at 17:26:54, otis williams wrote: >On September 07, 2004 at 15:04:08, Steven Schwartz wrote: > >>On September 07, 2004 at 14:40:54, Fernando Villegas wrote: >> >>>I do not understand in what sense CTF is "aroud" CCC. There is not need to go >>>there, neither CTF comes by force here to intrude with its stuff. Nobody needs >>>to feel himself asociated because there is a link to go there at the end and at >>>th beginning of CCc page. >>>My best >>>Fdo >> >>There is one other issue which perhaps is being overlooked.... >> >>Historically (rgcc being a perfect example), computer chess has >>been a lightening rod for vicious arguments, trolls, and name >>calling. >> >>CTF gave CCC a relief-valve so that arguments, which may have >>denegrated this board, could be moved there so as not to ruin >>the CCC landscape. >> >>I personally think that CCC has been a much more tranquil, on-topic >>environment since the CTF opened up. >>Steve > > > >This is nonsense and you know it, Nice to know though who I am dealing with, I >can see someone who supports racism and gay bashing, no doubt in anyone's mind >what you stand for, since you support the board I am not quite sure how you get the leap of faith from what I said above to my supporting racism and gay bashing, but you can rest assured that nothing, that's NOTHING, is further from the truth. Yes, if allowing other people to SAY that gay bashing and racism is right makes me agree with them, then you are correct. But you can bet all the money in the world (and win), that you have me pegged totally and completely wrong. However, as with people who are averse to gays and people of other races, I will defend your right to question what I believe in (even though you are wrong). Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.