Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 04:00:26 09/08/04
GUI= Chessprogram8
Pro Deo 48 MB hash as WbUCI Engine
Fritz 64 MB hash with Tablebases 5 men.
PB=off
Timecontrol=30 minutes
Result after 4 games: Pro Deo 1.0 ff vs. Fritz 8.0026 1,5 – 2,5
Here the games 3 and 4 (From testset ChessBase\testsets\Chessbits.cbh, 20
games):
[Event "P600, Blitz:30'"]
[Site "P3 600"]
[Date "2004.09.07"]
[Round "3"]
[White "Pro Deo 1.0 ff"]
[Black "Fritz 8"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "C47"]
[Annotator "-0.13;-0.40"]
[PlyCount "150"]
{W=11.7 ply; 200kN/s B=11.0 ply; 296kN/s; 4.022 TBAs} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3.
Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Nxe4 6. Qe2 f5 7. Ng5 d3 8. cxd3 Nd4 9. Qh5+ g6 10.
Qh4 c6 11. dxe4 cxd5 12. exd5 Bg7 13. Kd1 {Beide letzter Buchzug} h6 {
-0.40/11 42} 14. Nf3 {-0.13/12 34} Nxf3 {(Dxh4) -0.37/12 46} 15. Qxd8+ {
0.09/13 39} Kxd8 {-0.31/13 14} 16. gxf3 {-0.17/12 19} Bd4 {(g5) -0.28/13 54}
17. Be3 {(Ld3) -0.07/12 29} Bxb2 {-0.31/15 124} 18. Rb1 {-0.27/13 45} Bf6 {
-0.31/13 60} 19. Bd3 {(Tg1) -0.23/12 55} d6 {(b6) -0.53/12 34} 20. Bf4 {
(Tg1) -0.08/11 38} Be5 {(Le7) -0.68/13 63} 21. Bxe5 {-0.06/12 46} dxe5 {
-0.78/13 20} 22. Re1 {0.06/11 31} Re8 {-0.68/13 36} 23. Kd2 {(h4) 0.06/11 36}
g5 {(b6) -0.93/12 28} 24. Rh1 {(h4) -0.03/11 52} Ke7 {(e4) -1.00/13 46} 25. h4
{-0.07/11 23} g4 {(gxh4) -1.03/12 26} 26. fxg4 {-0.20/11 45} fxg4 {-0.87/12 28}
27. Ke3 {(f3) -0.26/11 43} Kd6 {-1.12/12 34} 28. Rhc1 {(Thg1) -0.29/11 42} Rf8
{-1.40/12 28} 29. Be2 {-0.35/10 21} Rf4 {(Tf7) -1.50/11 29} 30. Rc4 {
-0.41/11 29} Rxc4 {-1.59/13 31} 31. Bxc4 {-0.48/10 4} b6 {(Tb8) -1.59/13 25}
32. Rc1 {(Ld3) -0.83/12 58} Bb7 {(Ld7) -1.87/13 28} 33. Be2 {(Tg1) -1.38/13 37}
Rg8 {(h5) -2.25/13 50} 34. Rd1 {-1.41/13 54} g3 {(h5) -2.28/13 31} 35. fxg3 {
-1.54/12 22} Rxg3+ {-2.28/12 10} 36. Bf3 {-1.60/13 20} h5 {(Lc8) -2.40/14 31}
37. Kf2 {-1.84/14 32} Rh3 {-2.43/13 14} 38. Ke3 {(Lxh5) -2.03/13 28} Rxh4 {
-2.93/13 14} 39. Rd3 {(Td2) -2.41/13 26} Ra4 {(Th2) -3.18/12 11} 40. Bxh5 {
-2.46/14 30} Rxa2 {-3.43/12 12} 41. Bf7 {-2.88/13 14} b5 {(La6) -3.59/11 9} 42.
Rb3 {-3.39/13 29} a6 {-3.62/12 15} 43. Rd3 {(Tb1) -3.64/13 27} b4 {
(a5) -4.43/12 13} 44. Rd1 {-3.60/13 39} a5 {(Ta5) -4.53/12 20} 45. Rg1 {
-3.76/12 27} b3 {(Tc2) -5.12/10 6} 46. Rg6+ {-3.46/12 19} Kc5 {-4.81/11 4} 47.
d6 {-3.52/12 13} Ra3 {-4.93/11 9} 48. Kd3 {-4.35/12 32} b2+ {-4.93/10 4} 49.
Kc2 {-4.54/13 17} Rf3 {-5.25/11 7} 50. Kxb2 {-4.63/13 21} Rxf7 {-5.97/10 4} 51.
Rg1 {(Te6) -4.87/12 17} Bc6 {-6.18/11 10} 52. Rd1 {-5.34/12 29} e4 {
(Tb7+) -6.40/11 15} 53. Ka3 {-5.63/12 24} Rd7 {(a4) -6.72/12 14} 54. Re1 {
(Tc1+) -5.89/12 15} Rxd6 {(Kxd6) -7.15/13 13} 55. Rc1+ {-5.84/12 10} Kd4 {
-7.31/13 10} 56. Kb3 {-6.23/12 10} Bd5+ {(e3) -8.59/11 14} 57. Ka4 {-6.84/12 21
} e3 {(Lc4) -8.53/11 4} 58. Kxa5 {(Te1) -6.44/12 13} e2 {(Lc4) -13.56/11 5} 59.
Ka4 {(Kb5) -7.56/13 23} Rh6 {(Ta6+) -19.65/10 5} 60. Re1 {-11.04/14 15} Rh1 {
(Lc4) -#23/9 1} 61. Rxe2 {-0.41/12 18} Ra1+ {(Kc5) -#22/6 0} 62. Kb4 {
-0.40/11 10} Rb1+ {-#21/6 0} 63. Ka3 {(Ka4) -0.40/10 7} Rb3+ {(Kc3) -#16/6 0}
64. Ka4 {-0.41/11 9} Kc5 {-#15/6 0} 65. Rc2+ {(Te1) -0.47/12 14} Bc4 {-#14/6 0}
66. Rf2 {-0.48/11 8} Re3 {(Tc3) -#13/6 0} 67. Rc2 {-0.45/12 9} Rd3 {
(Te7) -#12/6 0} 68. Rb2 {-#8/11 4} Rd6 {(Td8) -#7/6 0} 69. Rb5+ {-7.78/7 1}
Bxb5+ {-#6/6 0} 70. Kb3 {(Ka3) -#6/9 1} Ba4+ {(Td3+) -#5/6 0} 71. Kc3 {
(Ka3) -#3/7 1} Rd1 {-#4/6 0} 72. Kb2 {-7.35/3 0} Kb4 {-#3/6 0} 73. Ka2 {-#1/3 0
} Rd2+ {(Kc3) -#3/4 0} 74. Kb1 {-#3/3 0} Ka3 {(Kc3) -#2/3 0} 75. Kc1 {
(Ka1) #0/2 0} Rd1# {-#1/2 0} 0-1
My comment: the game 3 going forced in a endgame, and here was Fritz 8 much
stronger.
What can I do? A little bit more Endgame-Knowledge for Pro Deo please! :)
[Event "P600, Blitz:30'"]
[Site "P3 600"]
[Date "2004.09.07"]
[Round "4"]
[White "Fritz 8"]
[Black "Pro Deo 1.0 ff"]
[Result "1-0"]
[ECO "C47"]
[Annotator "-0.38;-0.27"]
[PlyCount "115"]
{W=13.5 ply; 307kN/s; 22.905 TBAs B=13.3 ply; 217kN/s} 1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3.
Nc3 Nf6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nd5 Nxe4 6. Qe2 f5 7. Ng5 d3 8. cxd3 Nd4 9. Qh5+ g6 10.
Qh4 c6 11. dxe4 cxd5 12. exd5 Bg7 13. Kd1 {Beide letzter Buchzug} h6 {
-0.27/11 36} 14. Nf3 {-0.38/13 90} d6 {(Sxf3) -0.23/12 60} 15. Qxd8+ {
(Dg3) -0.19/12 35} Kxd8 {-1.10/9 2} 16. Bd3 {(Tb1) -0.32/13 113} b6 {
-0.36/13 60} 17. Re1 {(Sh4) -0.35/13 95} Nxf3 {-0.39/13 54} 18. gxf3 {
-0.32/13 40} Bd7 {(g5) -0.34/12 48} 19. Rg1 {(a4) -0.44/12 43} g5 {-0.27/12 46}
20. f4 {(Tb1) -0.32/12 33} g4 {-0.59/12 35} 21. Rb1 {-0.25/12 28} Rc8 {
(Te8) -0.50/12 38} 22. Be3 {(b4) -0.22/13 39} Bf6 {-0.39/12 62} 23. f3 {
0.00/13 46} gxf3 {(Te8) -0.39/11 35} 24. Rg6 {(Ke1) 0.03/12 29} Ke7 {
-0.32/12 44} 25. Ke1 {-0.03/12 33} Rhg8 {(Kf7) -0.31/11 32} 26. Rxh6 {
0.22/12 29} Rh8 {-0.27/11 29} 27. Rxf6 {0.18/13 57} Kxf6 {-0.24/9 3} 28. Bd4+ {
-0.13/14 44} Kf7 {(Ke7) -0.48/14 44} 29. Bxh8 {-0.03/13 15} Rxh8 {-0.12/11 3}
30. Kf2 {0.00/14 32} Rxh2+ {-0.30/13 24} 31. Kxf3 {0.00/15 41} Rh3+ {
-0.36/13 20} 32. Ke2 {0.00/14 34} Kf6 {(Th2+) -0.28/13 32} 33. Rc1 {0.00/13 26}
Be8 {(Th2+) -0.11/13 30} 34. Rc8 {(Tc7) 0.00/12 20} Bf7 {(Lh5+) -0.27/13 20}
35. Rc6 {0.28/13 26} Rh2+ {0.00/13 31} 36. Ke3 {-0.03/14 33} Rxb2 {0.29/13 22}
37. Bc4 {0.06/13 28} b5 {0.10/14 18} 38. Bb3 {0.18/14 26} Ke7 {(a5) 0.13/14 25}
39. Rc7+ {0.06/13 31} Kf6 {(Ke8) 0.14/14 26} 40. Rd7 {0.37/13 17} a5 {
1.08/14 34} 41. Rxd6+ {0.84/13 19} Kg7 {1.11/13 30} 42. Rb6 {1.09/13 19} a4 {
0.87/12 16} 43. d6 {0.81/13 29} Rh2 {0.92/12 21} 44. d7 {0.81/12 19} Rh8 {
1.37/13 39} 45. Bxf7 {(Lc2) 0.84/12 15} Kxf7 {1.08/10 1} 46. Rxb5 {1.00/14 32}
Ke7 {1.26/14 23} 47. Rxf5 {1.03/13 12} Kxd7 {1.37/14 16} 48. Ra5 {1.03/13 15}
Rh3+ {1.35/14 18} 49. Ke4 {0.97/14 19} Ra3 {1.33/14 19} 50. Rd5+ {0.93/14 20}
Ke7 {(Ke6) 1.32/13 18} 51. Rd2 {0.93/15 21} Rc3 {(Kf6) 1.31/12 12} 52. Rd3 {
1.25/13 10} Rc2 {(Tc5) 1.35/14 25} 53. a3 {(Ta3) 1.18/14 13} Re2+ {
(Ta2) 1.28/13 12} 54. Kd5 {(Te3) 1.65/13 10} Kf6 {1.14/15 12} 55. Rd4 {
1.81/13 11} Re3 {1.16/16 21} 56. Rxa4 {2.00/12 14} Kf5 {(Te1) 1.18/14 12} 57.
Ra8 {(Kd6) 2.28/12 14} Kxf4 {(Td3+) 1.01/13 12} 58. a4 {adjud. #41/6 0} 1-0
Game 4 was a endgame too.
We can see that Tablebase are here very important.
(Ed, please does import the Tablebases!)
Diagram 1:
Fritz 8 - Pro Deo 1.0 ff, P600, Blitz:30'
[D]R7/8/8/3K1k2/5P2/P3r3/8/8 b - - 0 1
Analysis by Pro Deo 1.0 ff:
57...Kxf4 58.a4 Te5+ 59.Kc6 Te6+ 60.Kc5 Te5+ 61.Kd4 Te4+ 62.Kd5 Te5+ 63.Kc6 Te6+
64.Kc5 Te5+ 65.Kd4 Te4+ 66.Kd5
± (0.98) Tiefe: 12 00:00:08 1927kN
(Nemeth, Privat 08.09.2004)
Diagram 2 (after 57…Kxf4):
Fritz 8 - Pro Deo 1.0 ff, P600, Blitz:30'
[D]R7/8/8/3K4/5k2/P3r3/8/8 w - - 0 1
Analysis by Pro Deo 1.0 ff:
1. +- (#41): 1.a4
2. = (0.00): 1.Ta7
3. = (0.00): 1.Ta6
4. = (0.00): 1.Ta4+
5. = (0.00): 1.Tb8
6. = (0.00): 1.Tc8
7. = (0.00): 1.Tf8+
8. = (0.00): 1.Tg8
9. = (0.00): 1.Th8
10. = (0.00): 1.Kc4
11. = (0.00): 1.Kc5
12. = (0.00): 1.Kc6
13. = (0.00): 1.Kd4
14. = (0.00): 1.Kd6
(Nemeth, Privat 08.09.2004)
Only a4! wins. But, this is the strength by the Tablebases!!
Ok, we will see what brings us the next games (I hope, no many endgames :).
Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.