Author: Albert Silver
Date: 10:31:18 09/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 08, 2004 at 11:21:45, Jonas Bylund wrote:
>>As has been said, CTF's financial survival has already been assured, so any
>>contribution you made would in fact be towards specifically towards CCC. If you
>>then claim that you won't donate to CCC because of CTF's link to CCC, your
>>actions are in direct contradiction of your words "I would fight for the right
>>to keep CTF up and running".
>>
>> Albert
>
>No i just dont want ot pay for something that is associated with CCC when i find
>it to be wrong.
As I said, you're not paying for CTF in any way or form. Your refusal to support
CCC despite claiming you would fight for the right for CTF to stay up and
running is a direct contradition of your own words. Think of it:
Your words:
1) I want to support CCC, but only CCC.
2) I would fight for the right to keep CTF up and running.
Your deeds:
1) I won't support only CCC.
2) I refuse to have anything to do with a site that has a link to CTF.
Perhaps, with all due respect, you aren't quite as open-minded as you wish to
believe.
Albert
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.