Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Question about Check extension

Author: Andrew Platt

Date: 16:16:15 09/08/04

Go up one level in this thread


On September 08, 2004 at 17:17:38, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>For example, the one-reply-to-check extension can be made to skip the first such
>extension by just using 3/4 of a ply.  Adding 3/4 of a ply doesn't extend, but
>if you get another one-reply extension in the same path, now you have extended
>1.5 plies which adds 1 ply of depth.  Alternatively you can do as I do and start
>every search at x.75 plies.  IE my 5 ply search starts with a depth of 5.75
>plies, but that only searches to 5 plies normally.  Any 3/4 ply extension will
>take that to 6.5 which is the same as 6 plies.  Another 3/4 ply extension will
>take that to 7.25 which extends another real ply.  Another 3.4 ply extension
>takes us to 8, another real extension.  But another only takes us to 8.75 which
>doesn't change the depth.  IE using 3/4 ply extensions means you are really
>saying "extend 3 times and then skip one, which is one way of controlling tree
>growth.
>
>Different extensions can interact using this approach, so that one says extend
>for 3/4 plies, another says extend for 1/2 ply, the net result is a 1 ply
>extension...

Interestingly in a simple case of just check extensions this will have the
opposite effect as Ed's - at least for the first few extensions - because he's
dropping it at the beginning and then catching up later whereas you are dropping
it later in the search. He estimates 10 ELO difference; do you believe that
would be the case for Crafty?

Andy.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.