Author: Hristo
Date: 19:17:15 09/08/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 08, 2004 at 21:38:18, Steve B wrote: >>Freeloader as in not having to pay for several years, for something that does >>cost money. > >this makes no sense at all >"freeloading" would apply if i did not make a contribution. >in this usage of the term you freeloaded as well because you also did not pay >for several years. Indeed, I was a freeloader the same as you or anyone else here. However, now some (you and I) have decided to not be freeloaders any more, while others have decided to reason into staying in the freeload zone. With your messages, I believe that you are contributing to their desire and validation. At any rate, I didn't mean that you are a "freeloader" at this very moment (after reading your second post and rereading the entire first post). Sorry for that. >all 5000 active e-mail accounts freeloaded as well >it makes no sense at all to say this. >you obviously did not read fully my posts and so assumed i did not contribute >and i was using the CCC-CTF linkage as as excuse You are correct. I didn't finish reading your entire post before responding. I apologize! :-/ > > >>While you made your donation you are promoting the unreasonable demands of those >>who haven't. > >no,i am agreeing with those who object to the CTF in its current state. >there are a good number of CCC members who have made contributions already and >also object to the CTF in its current state >these would include(but not be limited to )current CCC moderators and past CCC >moderators > >it is interesting to note(for those reading this thread)that you are a CTF >moderator How does that make any difference? Regards, Hristo > >Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.