Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: WB vs. UCI

Author: Dann Corbit

Date: 12:05:56 09/09/04

Go up one level in this thread


On September 09, 2004 at 02:24:23, James Constance wrote:

>Please excuse me if these topics have been covered!
>
>For example, with Pro Deo, is there any speed advantage by using it as a
>winboard engine rather than a UCI?

If you are using Winboard as the GUI, then winboard is a more logical protocol.

For any UCI interface, then UCI probably makes more sense.

>If used as a winboard engine, what parameters need to be set?
>
>How is the personality changed when used as a winboard engine?
>
>With Pro Deo as a UCI it's possible to change anti-GM, strength, aggressiveness
>directly without changing the personality.  Is it possible to add things like
>King Safety and the Passed Pawn value so that they can be changed directly
>without changing the personality?
>
>Many thanks



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.