Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 14:11:35 09/09/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 2004 at 15:20:49, Matthew Hull wrote: >On September 09, 2004 at 15:13:25, Omid David Tabibi wrote: > >>On September 08, 2004 at 20:52:31, Dan Honeycutt wrote: >> >>>On September 08, 2004 at 14:43:43, Omid David Tabibi wrote: >>> >>>> >>>>The average level of discussion in WCCC is several hundred Elo above that of >>>>CCC. >>>> >>> >>>That's logical since everyone there is an experienced chess programmer whereas >>>CCC caters to all levels. However, are there topics that you would be willing >>>to discuss at WCCC that you would not be willing to discuss at CCC? >> >>Most of the discussions here are relevant to under 2300 rated programs, and >>rarely any ideas of further use are discussed here. In WCCC when you play versus >>another engine, you always engage in some form of discusson with the programmer >>sitting on the other side of the table, or when you are in a restaurant you also >>speak about computer-chess issues with other programmers, etc. Of course most >>programmers don't discuss the details of their "weapon of mass destruction", but >>the discussion level is much higher, and many subjects that are brought up there >>never appear on CCC. > > > I don't understand what your question has to do with the post you replied to, but here are the answers anyway: >So, to how many processors have you scaled Falcon? Currently 4 processors is the maximum. >Will it run on 8+ NUMA machine? No, I don't have acces to such a machine. >Is it portable (like GNU or Crafty) or is it limited to Windows? Yes. Most of my parallel tests are on Linux. Any more questions? :) > > > >> >> >> >> >>> >>>Dan H.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.