Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Regarding CCC discussion level

Author: Omid David Tabibi

Date: 14:21:43 09/10/04

Go up one level in this thread


On September 10, 2004 at 12:12:29, Dan Honeycutt wrote:

>On September 09, 2004 at 20:57:11, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>Without wishing to interrupt, I just wanted to comment on my awe at all this
>>elevation.
>>
>>                                       Albert
>
>This all started with Anthony saying he guessed he needed to show up at WCCC if
>he wanted to talk to good chess programmers.  I would contend that that's not
>necessary.  Naturally CCC has a lot more discussion of the basics, but it's not
>limited to just the basics.  Like Omid says, programmers are not going to
>divulge their WMDs, but they are otherwise happy to talk about their program -
>be it WCCC or CCC.

In WCCC you learn many things from other programmers, and they learn from you.
Nobody says everything, but surely much more than what's being said in CCC.

I justed posted some info about Falcon that might be interesting for some
people, but did anyone actually learn something new from what I posted here?

From time to time I do publish new things I find interesting (see my publication
page for two of the already published papers, with the third under way). But
there are other programmers that your only chance hearing them talk about their
programs (whatever the extent) is in WCCC.


>
>Dan H.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.