Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Regarding CCC discussion level

Author: Omid David Tabibi

Date: 16:59:12 09/10/04

Go up one level in this thread


On September 10, 2004 at 17:21:43, Omid David Tabibi wrote:

>On September 10, 2004 at 12:12:29, Dan Honeycutt wrote:
>
>>On September 09, 2004 at 20:57:11, Albert Silver wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Without wishing to interrupt, I just wanted to comment on my awe at all this
>>>elevation.
>>>
>>>                                       Albert
>>
>>This all started with Anthony saying he guessed he needed to show up at WCCC if
>>he wanted to talk to good chess programmers.  I would contend that that's not
>>necessary.  Naturally CCC has a lot more discussion of the basics, but it's not
>>limited to just the basics.  Like Omid says, programmers are not going to
>>divulge their WMDs, but they are otherwise happy to talk about their program -
>>be it WCCC or CCC.
>
>In WCCC you learn many things from other programmers, and they learn from you.
>Nobody says everything, but surely much more than what's being said in CCC.
>
>I justed

Here comes my contribution to the English language :)


>posted some info about Falcon that might be interesting for some
>people, but did anyone actually learn something new from what I posted here?
>
>From time to time I do publish new things I find interesting (see my publication
>page for two of the already published papers, with the third under way). But
>there are other programmers that your only chance hearing them talk about their
>programs (whatever the extent) is in WCCC.
>
>
>>
>>Dan H.



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.