Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 00:24:44 09/11/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 10, 2004 at 20:35:39, Drexel,Michael wrote: >On September 10, 2004 at 03:20:24, Jorge Pichard wrote: > >>Here you can compare Jonny 2.70 using different Opening Books, first with Harry >>Schnapp Mainbokk and then with o-eville.pgn. Take a close look at the dirrent >>results. For those that argue that an opening book doesn't make a big >>difference, please take a loser look. > >The engines were often out of book at move 4 or 5. >You really think thats an experiment about opening books? The length of the opening line is not that important, the purpose of a good opening is also to take the opponent out of any good response, it doesn't matter if the first move is 1.h3 as long as you accomplish to confuse your opponent :-) > >Two examples to prove my point: > >[D] r1bqk2r/ppp2pbp/2nppnp1/8/2PPP3/P1N2N2/1P2BPPP/R1BQK2R b KQkq - 0 7 > >Here Jonny out of book played 7...d5? >This is obviously a mistake. White should be much better after 8.e5. >However Movei managed to lose this game. > >[D] rnbqk2r/pp3ppp/2p1pn2/3p4/2PP4/P1P2P2/4P1PP/R1BQKBNR w KQkq - 0 7 > >The last book move 6...c6 is not very popular. >Movei came up with 7.cxd5? (Thank you very much) exd5 8.g4 and got smashed. >The results of such games tell us nothing about the opening books used. > >Conclusion: >It was just a random result. > >Michael The purpose of a good opening is also to take the opponent out of any good response, therefore, even if I open with 1.h3 which is considered a bad open, I have managed to win a lot of games against friends of my same rating.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.