Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Pro Deo at Blitz: re-examined

Author: Kurt Utzinger

Date: 21:52:49 09/11/04

Go up one level in this thread


On September 11, 2004 at 23:12:46, Albert Silver wrote:

>One of the common seen comments on Pro Deo is that it is a poor blitz player.
>I've seen this comment in several Computer Chess forums. However, one can't help
>but notice how unusually quickly it plays compared to the time it has alloted,
>no matter what the time control. At the Pro Deo parameter page
>(http://members.home.nl/matador/engine.htm) there is a switch that allows one to
>have Pro Deo play faster or slower on average:
>
>[Time Control ? 125]            * 125
>[Time Control Status ? PB ONLY] * ALWAYS|PB ONLY
>
>(to activate, one must replace the '?' with '=')
>
>I ran 2 blitz matches using the Nunn 2 set with Pro Deo playing against Ruffian
>1.05 at 5 mins + 3 sec increment, in one set using the default settings
>(September 1st) and in the other using the time control parameter. The only
>other change I made was to turn off all learning (position, engine, book) so as
>to be sure the conditions were identical. It's not conclusive but it is very
>interesting, as 80 games were played in all.
>
>Conditions: Athlon 2400XP+, 32 MB hash, Arena 1.08 GUI, pondering off.
>
>Without Time Control setting: Pro Deo lost 16 - 24 to Ruffian 1.05
>
>With the Time Control setting (at 125): Pro Deo *won* 20.5 - 19.5
>
>                                        Albert



     Hi Albert
     Indeed interesting. To verify if the above has not been reached
     by accident you should run some further matches to compare
     I think. The usage of time is a very important matter and
     if this could be improved with Pro Deo this would of course
     be a benefit to Ed Schröder's engine.
     Kurt



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.