Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Extending Checks

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 03:50:50 09/12/04

On September 11, 2004 at 11:47:35, José Carlos wrote:

>On September 10, 2004 at 21:35:58, Stuart Cracraft wrote:
>
>>I read, somewhere, and I forget who, about
>>if 1 legal move, extend 2 ply,
>>2 or more legal moves, then 1 ply.
>>Anyone have any stats on the effects
>>on play of the above instead of
>>always extend 1 legal move. Does it
>>blow up?


>  I guess you read it in Ed's programming page about Rebel. He does that in
>qsearch, and regarding checking moves generation.
>  I tried his idea in my private program and it didn't work for me. It generated
>too many nodes, but I probably did something wrong.

Checks in QS works provided you hash in QS. With exploding checks hash
move-ordering is crucial.

My best,

Ed

Re: Extending Checks José Carlos 10:22:52 09/12/04
- Re: Extending Checks Ed Schröder 14:39:45 09/12/04
  - Re: Extending Checks Robert Hyatt 20:54:18 09/12/04
    - Re: Extending Checks Ed Schröder 23:55:22 09/12/04
      - Re: Extending Checks Robert Hyatt 07:16:58 09/13/04
        
        Re: Extending Checks Ed Schröder 08:31:44 09/13/04
        
        Re: Extending Checks Michael Henderson 10:51:42 09/13/04
        
        Re: Extending Checks Robert Hyatt 10:20:07 09/13/04
        
        Re: Extending Checks Ed Schröder 09:35:50 09/14/04
        
        Re: Extending Checks Robert Hyatt 14:13:59 09/14/04
      - Re: Extending Checks Gerd Isenberg 01:53:10 09/13/04
        
        Re: Extending Checks Ed Schröder 03:13:32 09/13/04
        
        Re: Extending Checks Gerd Isenberg 03:13:35 09/14/04

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.