Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Pro Deo vs. Aristarch 4.5 results

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 23:49:21 09/12/04

Go up one level in this thread


On September 12, 2004 at 23:21:40, Albert Silver wrote:

>On September 11, 2004 at 23:12:46, Albert Silver wrote:
>
>>One of the common seen comments on Pro Deo is that it is a poor blitz player.
>>I've seen this comment in several Computer Chess forums. However, one can't help
>>but notice how unusually quickly it plays compared to the time it has alloted,
>>no matter what the time control. At the Pro Deo parameter page
>>(http://members.home.nl/matador/engine.htm) there is a switch that allows one to
>>have Pro Deo play faster or slower on average:
>>
>>[Time Control ? 125]            * 125
>>[Time Control Status ? PB ONLY] * ALWAYS|PB ONLY
>>
>>(to activate, one must replace the '?' with '=')
>>
>>I ran 2 blitz matches using the Nunn 2 set with Pro Deo playing against Ruffian
>>1.05 at 5 mins + 3 sec increment, in one set using the default settings
>>(September 1st) and in the other using the time control parameter. The only
>>other change I made was to turn off all learning (position, engine, book) so as
>>to be sure the conditions were identical. It's not conclusive but it is very
>>interesting, as 80 games were played in all.
>>
>>Conditions: Athlon 2400XP+, 32 MB hash, Arena 1.08 GUI, pondering off.
>>
>>Without Time Control setting: Pro Deo lost 16 - 24 to Ruffian 1.05
>>
>>With the Time Control setting (at 125): Pro Deo *won* 20.5 - 19.5
>>
>>                                        Albert
>
>
>I tested again against Aristarch 4.5.
>
>Without Time Control setting: Pro Deo beat Aristarch 21.5 - 18.5
>
>With the Time Control setting: Pro Deo beat Aristarch 22.5 - 17.5
>
>                                      Albert


Maybe I should re-test the ALWAYS option :-)

Ed



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.