Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Pro Deo 1.0vff, Style by Eduard Nemeth

Author: Albert Silver

Date: 07:17:40 09/14/04

Go up one level in this thread


>That's because you are using the MISC_17 switch. It forces the engine to skip
>the first extension which generally will speed up the search between 20-50%.

Any comments on the results of your testing of this?

>One thing you should avoid, when using the MISC_58 switch realize that [Passed
>Pawns = xxx] is still active. In your style you use both:
>
>[Passed Pawns = 120]            * 120
>[Pruning = MISC_58]             * Recalculate passed pawns
>[M58_Table = strong]            * normal|midg|endg|strong
>
>This means that the STRONG setting is rewarded with an extra 20% which is way
>out of proportion. When using STRONG it's more likely that [Passed Pawns = 95]
>wil do a better job.

I find that the STRONG is already out of proportion and use the NORMAL setting.

>For the next version I am planning a build-in help-text that explains all the
>parameters in detail, which textfile you can freely modify with your own
>comments.

Yes! Please! :-)

Could one pester you about three parameters all the same? (any answer would be
most welcome)

Is the Strong Squares only for knight outposts, or does it encourage advanced
outposts for pieces such as the bishop or rook as well?

How does the Pawn Pressure parameter affect the game? Does it pawn advances or
is it something else altogether?

What is the difference between [Pawn Formation] and [Pawn Structure]?

                                Many thanks!

                                      Albert

>
>My best,
>
>Ed



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.