Author: martin fierz
Date: 13:50:25 09/14/04
Go up one level in this thread
On September 14, 2004 at 16:45:02, Albert Silver wrote: >On September 14, 2004 at 14:58:42, Evgeny Shu wrote: > >>I wonder where is the interest if computer analysing the game and not the human >>? :) > >Without wishing to criticize, I ask myself the exact same thing. I'm not going >to enter the whole "is it cheating?" debate, since that's not even the issue. >Still, what fun can it be to sit there feeding a computer's moves, no matter how >well you administered the time and engines used? I guess the bottom line is what >is more important to you: the results or the actual playing? > > Albert i know a swiss correspondence player who has some title (i forget what, corr-IM i think) who pays an over-the-board IM to help him decide on moves. bottom line: there are always people interested in results, and the recognition they can get from these results, because only few people realize that they cheated. cheers martin
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.